perfect prof only 3 – customwritings.pro
February 24, 2021
perormance appraisal methods hrm – customwritings.pro
February 24, 2021

Attached is more instructions that needed to be followed

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Chapter 8, 9
  • Lesson
  • Link (Word doc): Source Evaluation WorksheetPreview the document
  • Minimum of 5 scholarly sources

Instructions
Use the Source Evaluation Worksheet to submit an annotated bibliography of 5 sources that you intend to use in your paper. Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each source.

You may collect the worksheets together as one document or you may submit a separate worksheet for each source.

Click on the following link for an example of an annotation.

Link: Annotation Example

Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51, 541-554.

The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 100-150 words per source (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page

Grading
This activity will be graded using the Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 5

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts

Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuantity of Sources

5.0 pts 5 or more sources

4.25 pts 4 sources

3.75 pts 3 sources

3.0 pts 2 sources

0.0 pts 1 or no sources

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality /Reliability of Sources

5.0 pts All works are from scholarly sources.

4.25 pts Most works are from scholarly sources; no more than 1 from a substantive source.

3.75 pts Some works are from scholarly sources; no more than 2 from substantive sources.

3.0 pts Sources substantive or lower in quality.

0.0 pts Few or no sources reach even substantive level; popular sources cited.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecency of Sources

5.0 pts All sources less than 5 years old; if older, historical significance explained

4.25 pts 1 source older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance

3.75 pts 2 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance

3.0 pts 3 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance

0.0 pts 4 or more sources older than 5 years old w/no explanation of historical significance

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Fluency of Annotations

25.0 pts All annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; clearly conveying main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay.

21.25 pts Most annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; give sense of main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay.

18.75 pts Annotations are well-written but do not describe scope of source material; do not give clear idea of how source will be used in essay.

12.0 pts Annotations do not describe scope of source material and/or do not give idea of how they will be used in essay.

0.0 pts Annotations lack detail, give no idea of how they will be used in essay OR no annotations.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA and Documentation

10.0 pts Citations are formatted correctly.

8.5 pts There are a few formatting errors.

7.5 pts There are some formatting errors.

6.0 pts There are many and/or frequent formatting errors.

0.0 pts There is little or no adherence to APA format in the document.

The post HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation appeared first on Submit Your Homeworks.


HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation was first posted on February 24, 2021 at 1:59 am.
©2019 "Submit Your Assignment". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@customwritings.pro

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Essay Writing Service
ORDER NOW