ritique a peer-reviewed study, and in your own words, describe the research question, sample, design of study, data collection method, findings, and limitations of each.
October 9, 2018
Summarize how the principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice apply
October 9, 2018

Phase 6: Implementation of the Care PlanYou are now in Phase 6 of your Capstone project. You have developed a comprehensive care plan for the aggregate. Over the next two weeks, you will develop an implementation plan for your aggregate. The first step to effective implementation is planning. As you go about this task, answer the following questions:

  • What small group would you select (for example, three families with young children, a group of five AIDS patients, and so on)? What made you select this particular group?
  • What portion of the plan would you like to implement in the small group?
  • What health risk do you expect to tackle by implementing this intervention?
  • What results do you expect?
  • How do you plan to implement this intervention? Do you have any specific strategy in mind? What resources will you need?
  • How long do you think it will take for the results to be seen?
  • What resources do you need?
By the due date assigned, prepare a 1-2 page Microsoft Word document with your responses to the questions above and submit it to the Submissions Area.
Criteria
Student did not submit assignment.No group selected.Selected a group but no rationale provided for the selection.Selected a small group and provided vague rationale for the selection.Selected an appropriate, small group and provided rationale for the selection.
Criteria
Student did not submit assignment.No selection of the plan identified for implementation.Identified the section of the plan that will be implemented in the small group. Included no rationale for the selection.Identified the section of the plan that is appropriate for implementation in the small group. Included vague rationale for the selection.Identified the section of the plan that is appropriate for implementation in the small group. Included clear and appropriate rationale for the selection.
Criteria
Student did not submit assignment.No description included.Unclear description included.Clear description included.Clear description included along with appropriate rationale.
Criteria
Student did not submit assignment.No description included.Unclear description included.Clear description included.Clear description included along with appropriate rationale.
Criteria
Student did not submit assignment.No description included.Unclear description included.Clear description included and listed resources needed.Clear description included along with specific strategies, and listed resources needed.
Criteria
Student did not submit assignment.No estimate provided.Provided an estimate but with no rationale.Provided an estimate but with vague rationale.Provided an estimate but with clear rationale.
Criteria
Student did not submit assignment.Did not participate in implementation discussion.Participated in implementation discussion with very little input.Participated in implementation discussion.Participated in the implementation discussion with a clear proposal.
Criteria
Student did not submit assignment.Introduction is limited or missing entirely. The paper lacks a thesis statement. Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely. Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped. The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred. Transitions are sporadic. Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic. The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement. Transitions are appropriate and help the flow of ideas. Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background info, and clearly states the topic. The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis. Thoughtful transitions clearly show how ideas relate. Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.
Criteria
Student did not submit assignment.Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar, and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension.Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.
Criteria
Student did not submit assignment.No attempt at APA format.APA format is attempted to paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor.Using APA format, accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present.
Overall Score
]]>

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Essay Writing Service
ORDER NOW